I’m
thinking that M/F by Anthony Burgess must be his reaction to William Burroughs. How else to explain Burgess’s use of stream
of consciousness, oddball fantasy crushed into normal narrative, not using
quotes when writing dialogue? I wouldn’t
be surprised if he even used some cut up technique here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-up_technique
This story
is ostensibly about incest although honestly I got lost in the plot and still
don’t really understand how the narrator Miles Faber and his sister are
connected. The best I can gather from
the postscript at the end and the scene with the lawyer at the very beginning
is that incest is a tradition in the Faber family.
Burgess
is a writer that usually skillfully transposes his vulgar yet erudite and busy
style on whatever genre suits the narrative be it the futuristic sci-fi of A CLOCKWORK
ORANGE or THE WANTING SEED or the thinly disguised memoir of THE MALAYAN
TRILOGY or screwball comedy like HONEY FOR THE BEARS (the distant relationship
between the narrator’s adventures and homosexuality in BEARS and the narrator
and incest in this book are similar).
Here
I think he may be a little bit out of his depth although the Burgess trademark fast
paced storyline keeps things interesting.
Burgess meets the Beats (especially Burroughs) and the result is babble
conversation, surreal ink-every penned word unreal. This is not Burgess’s best book but worth a
read for fans.
1 comment:
Burgess meats the Beats indeed. Nice review!
Post a Comment