Regarding the Paris shooting, I have six questions.
Before I ask those six
questions, I’d like to state where I am coming from. A False Flag operation is defined as a covert
military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the
operations appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or
nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.
Many countries throughout history
have conducted false flag operations to push an unwitting populace towards an
end goal whether it be simply hating a particular enemy or actually building
support for an armed conflict.
Some examples of false flag operations
committed by the US that have been confirmed and are a matter of historical
record – Operations Northwoods and Operation Gladio (also involving NATO) as
well as numerous other smaller operations in Cuba and Latin America as well as
Vietnam and the Middle East.
An example of a false flag
operation committed by Israel – The Lavon Affair.
Many historians also believe
the 1933 Nazi Reichstag Fire and the Russian Apartment building bombing of 1999
were also false flag operations.
I have an open mind which is
why I am asking these questions but my initial impression is this was a
paramilitary operation conducted by a foreign power (The MO matches the Mossad)
for the purpose of further pushing the idea of Islamic terrorism as the number
one threat of the day.
Here are my six questions....
1.) This was a well-organized
operation. They even scheduled it for
the time of day when there was less traffic in that area. Who trained them and where did they get this
training?
2.) France has strict weapons
laws. Where did they get the guns?
3.) According to
eyewitnesses, the gunmen knew who they were looking for. That partially makes sense as some of the
cartoonists were somewhat celebrities but some of the others they targeted in
the magazine’s offices were not. How log
had they been conducting surveillance?
Was there someone inside the office helping them (they also apparently
knew where everyone sat)?
4.) A witness has stated that the gunmen announced
they were with AL Qaeda. There is an unconfirmed
report one of more of the gunmen was also affiliated with ISIS. These two groups do not work together and
that makes no sense. In addition, one of
the suspected gunmen spent some time in prison for sending weapons to Iraq . Which is correct? If in fact the answer is ISIS is itself a
Western construct and then that begs even more questions going back to my question
#1
5.) Supposedly, one of the gunmen
dropped his wallet carrying his ID inside a car they used. Does anyone really believe that?
6.) What is the meaning of
the cryptic last tweet before the shooting from the Charlie Hebdo office
wishing the leader of ISIS good health?
Were they hacked? Looking at the
cartoon, it seems sincere????
What I would like to see
happen is at least a couple of days of investigation before the media takes
over. Even during 09/11, it was a day or
two before Osama bin Laden was definitely fingered. I even read a story going round on CNN and other
places the first 24 hours that Serbian groups were responsible for 09/11 due to
the bombing of Belgrade and that was investigated and ruled out. Here the story has already been written it
seems.
I won’t hold my breath waiting for
these answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment